Return-path: <WathesGoodPrice10@yahoo.com>
Envelope-to: kurt@blueliner.net
Delivery-date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:31:36 -0400
Received: from static-72-85-228-82.bstnma.east.verizon.net ([72.85.228.82])
	by www2.pit.tblive.com with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <WathesGoodPrice10@yahoo.com>)
	id 1P0exj-0000UQ-Kt
	for kurt@blueliner.net; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:31:36 -0400
X-Originating-IP: [72.85.228.82]
X-Originating-Email: [WathesGoodPrice10@yahoo.com] 
X-Sender: WathesGoodPrice10@yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 3086 by uid 760); Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:31:38 -0500
To: <kurt@blueliner.net>
From: <WathesGoodPrice10@yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=15.0
X-Spam-Score: 150
X-Spam-Bar: +++++++++++++++
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "www2.pit.tblive.com", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  http://bumptrot.ru [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (15.0 points, 6.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	3.5 BAYES_99               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
	[score: 1.0000]
	0.0 MISSING_MID            Missing Message-Id: header
	0.0 FH_HELO_EQ_D_D_D_D     Helo is d-d-d-d
	2.4 HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR    Relay HELO'd using suspicious hostname (IP addr
	1)
	0.0 MISSING_DATE           Missing Date: header
	2.3 FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD      'From' yahoo.com does not match 'Received' headers
	2.2 TVD_SPACE_RATIO        BODY: TVD_SPACE_RATIO
	3.0 RCVD_IN_XBL            RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
	[72.85.228.82 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
	1.5 URIBL_SBL              Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist
	[URIs: bumptrot.ru]
X-Spam-Flag: YES
Subject: ***SPAM*** hello!

http://bumptrot.ru