Return-path: <d_merrett@bigpond.com>
Envelope-to: kurt@blueliner.net
Delivery-date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 02:26:50 -0400
Received: from client-5-91.speedy-net.bg ([94.73.5.91])
	by www2.pit.tblive.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <d_merrett@bigpond.com>)
	id 1P0q7t-00030H-Aa
	for kurt@blueliner.net; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 02:26:50 -0400
Received: from 94.73.5.91 by extmail.bigpond.com; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:26:48 +0200
From: "Joann Gallagher" <d_merrett@bigpond.com>
To: <<kurt@blueliner.net>>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:26:48 +0200
Message-ID: <01cb5fb0$0ef4fb10$0100007f@d_merrett>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
Importance: Normal
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=9.2
X-Spam-Score: 92
X-Spam-Bar: +++++++++
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "www2.pit.tblive.com", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  http://jewemyquf.virtue.nu/dujikosu.html [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (9.2 points, 6.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	3.5 BAYES_99               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
	[score: 1.0000]
	3.0 RCVD_IN_XBL            RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
	[94.73.5.91 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
	0.7 SPF_NEUTRAL            SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral)
	2.0 URIBL_BLACK            Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
	[URIs: virtue.nu]
X-Spam-Flag: YES
Subject: ***SPAM*** Always able-rod with her

http://jewemyquf.virtue.nu/dujikosu.html